Critics and false accusations are different things.
If we criticize someone that he did not have enough time and motivation during 2 years to care too much about the project, that someone did not announce plans at Bitcointalk, it's critics, based on facts.
If you accuse that someone hated Michi, blocked her address vindicatively, had a physical or non-physical access to 62 B, or wanted somehow to get this access, took an action to delay the release and compete, hired and paid devs for insecure wallets, wanted just to pump Mooncoin with new features, decided things individually etc.
it is not critics, there are accusations based only on assumptions, and are you sure that they are not false?
Ok, even if you are 90 percent sure that they are not false (based on what? On your perception?), then is it correct to make false accusations, if there is even a 10 percent chance (in your opinion) that they are not true? Or you just so strongly believe that someone is so bad that you are 100 percent sure that it is worth to accuse? That is beyond my undestanding.
If critics is something which is not accepted, and will be answered with attacks and accusations, it will be difficult for Mooncoin community to come to consensus in the future.