Hello AC
Have a sincere question for you. You say that you have purchased all or many of the MA reports and I assume were/are subscribing to
the his private blog etc. I also assume you took the time to study and test out the validity of his trading advice, as any
intelligent investor would before risking their hard earned money.
My question to you is at what point and on what evidence did you gain enough confidence in MA's trading advice where you
decided to go ahead and risk and then lose enough money so that it has left you so pissed off?
Fred
Have a sincere question for you. You say that you have purchased all or many of the MA reports and I assume were/are subscribing to
the his private blog etc. I also assume you took the time to study and test out the validity of his trading advice, as any
intelligent investor would before risking their hard earned money.
My question to you is at what point and on what evidence did you gain enough confidence in MA's trading advice where you
decided to go ahead and risk and then lose enough money so that it has left you so pissed off?
Fred
First of all, your question cannot be answered because you are mixing three assumptions up.
1) That I was pissed off when I lost money
2) That I am posting here because I lost money
3) That I am posting so much because I lost so much money
Every speculator loses money at some point.
As to why I was getting pissed of, this is well documented here (click).
The big mistake a lot of people are making in my case is that they think everybody must act in their own interest, and therefore, their activity would need to be funded in some way to be sustainable.
That is the flaw in human nature that Martin Armstrong exploits. It does not apply to me. I don't have this flaw.
He says (literally): "There is no such thing as bad publicity" and he calculates quite correctly, that the majority, the silent losers will keep quiet because they are afraid to be seen as losers, and they do not see any gain in what I am doing so they move on.
So all he has to do is to replenish the pool of clients faster than the attrition rate.
I am here to break that cycle. That is why I am posting here. The fact is that I am winning. Why should I stop?
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.
Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.
See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.