I was thinking about some accusations, that there were 'individual instructions' and not the consensus thing. Anyway, when a dev codes a wallet, he does it whether after his own decision, whether after receiving instructions from other members. Instructions can be public, made by different community members via posting at forum, or instructions can be sent via PM, by a member who is a 'bridge' between the community and a dev. However, if the community agrees with something, asks for it, waits for it, if it is evident for everyone that something is good for the entire community, is it correct to say about 'individual instructions', even if finally these instructions were sent to a dev in a PM by one person who connected a dev and the community?
Another accusation was that things should not be voted at forum, but should be presented to miners via miners or users activated fork. Maybe it works for big coins like DOGE, LTC or BTC. But if there are about 50-80 nodes like in Mooncoin network and we understand that miners mine a coin mostly to sell it at exchanges and are not very well informed about a situation with Mooncoin, and one user can run easily 10 nodes, can we say that miners or users activated fork means community consensus and fair voting exactly in this case?
It worked in this way: community members were asked via posts in the thread and via PM about their decision and a dev was informed, or a dev asked other members by himself, via posting or via PM, some devs communicated also at Discord and got instructions from Discord community members. If even minority of members don't agree with something, for me it is always a sign that something is wrong. However, if I remember correct, until the last events, the only disagreement in the community about what to implement was about Mooncoin logo.
Accusations? Again? From the Mooncoin Core Team? They should stop making accusations and focus only on development instead, if that's really what they want, or definitely leave, as you already proposed to them...
No, I'm still thinking about accusations which were already made on the last pages of this thread.
My proposal was not simply 'to leave', it was about an independent dev who could be kind of 'peacemaker' for the entire community. It looks unreal to find this dev. Anyway, if someone donates his time and other resources to Mooncoin, we are not bosses to tell them what to do. It is very sad to see the split of community, bad emotions, accusations, untrue statements, but if someone makes them, it means that something is wrong, that we all are responsible for the situation when the community members are unhappy and instead of collaboration, peace and progress just accuse each other. During 2015-2017 years this ANN thread was a good place with positive emotions, interesting suggestions, normal critics, disputes, friendly communicating, there was a big community, and I cannot recall even one accusation or toxic communication, what happened to us all?