Perfect DT 1
DT containing undeniable scammers and scam facilitators

There is a chasm between these.

Still I request to know the logic employed to permit proven and undeniable scammers and those with histories that contain documented irrefutable direct financially motivated wrong doing to take positions on default trust1

This is a created position that need not exist. To create a platform of trust that can be knowingly  leveraged by scammers is very puzzling and worrying. To create a scenario proven scammers are permitted to leverage scamming and silencing whistle blowers from seems perhaps .....

Royce the evidence is 100% irrefutable no person has been able to debunk it.
Take the debate on those terms.  
Or change the question to
should proven scammers be allowed on to permitted  DT1
We don't need to make this a reputation

Are you saying you have never seen conclusive proof of scamming or scam facilitating from DT1?

So approach it as should they be permitted to remain or go to reputation and look at the first 2 pages only.
I don't wish to be derailed into a rep thread here

Of course you are free to read through the first 2 pages of the reputation thread or find the dirty turds thread that in sure you may have seen before.

I will delete this account if no such evidence can be provided once we clearly establish that scammers, willing scam facilitators for pay who try to delete the evidence, or those with documented directly financially motivated wrong doing in their histories here should not be on default trust 1