really ? the sounds like a cheating to me and it does depend on your pc ? sound cool too at the same time but how that all works ? anyway , that is the problem with player vs player game because you wouldnt know if your oponent is cheating on you or your oponent uses some kind of a.i instead of playing him itself but many players will prefer this way than you are competing with computers because your still not sure if the game is fair or not . many player vs player gambling exist before but havent see chess on them , still all of them didnt last long .
Well, it is cheating in a sense. There's a finite number of chess positions in a chess board, so having a pc that could compute/calculate every possible move out there that could lead to a win is pretty possible. This basically prevents you from moving any piece mistakenly, therefore creating a scenario where there's only a single path, which is to victor, that is
theoretically. It is close to impossible to predict
every single move out there so such a scenario is completely impossible. Though I am not particularly sure about end game scenarios, but there could be ways to determine the best moves out there once a certain scenario is reached.