As far i can tell STEEM was 99% ninja mined so 100% centralized....... at least for IDEAN you know its 101% decentralized
On point how would it behave, devs even now has almost no control, consensus of people have it, will it be good or bad depend on majority vote that will start very soon...
That's all what you can say ?
It's 101% decentralized just because you said it ? Without any proves ?
Why is this project not decentralized (as stated on the main site):
1. You cannot dispose of your property. You generate (mining) invitations, but you cannot sell them, you can only give them out for free. Because the developers intentionally do not disable the termination of newbies and candidates.
2. Candidates and newbies are always at risk of being "killed".
3. Developers urge to kill invitations from those people who make bad flips (bad in their opinion).
Here are some screenshots.
One of the main developers, as well as the admin, calls for killing those who make bad flips:
https://i.imgur.com/ltADmRh.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/UBBXxUX.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/Aiw9SV1.jpg4. Developers urge to send reports on bad flips - flips with porn, with politics and so on. But what about the freedom of speech mentioned on the main site?
5. Incredibly huge premine.
As a result, for each of these points, you depend on the third party. Is this decentralization? No. This is totalitarian control.
Is it lie ? No.
Especially point 3, where you, as a schoolboy, with CAPS LOCK and "!!!" scream about "killing" users ))
101% decentralized...
And even thats true ....
Why do I find this project dumb?
Because we are obliged to engage in stupidity.
1. Artificial intelligence (AI) is our future. Why create things that prevent it?
2. Developers prohibit numbering flips. This, by the way, is again a reference to the violation of decentralization and freedom of speech.
Let's clarify some things.
We are all different people.
Different nationalities, different cultures, different logics, different imaginations, and so on and so on and so forth.
One person creates a flip and considers it quite logical, but another person may simply not understand it. And this is natural. We are all different.
But then confusion arises.
And a similar mess appeared thousands of years ago. And then SMART people came up with numbers. One for all. People simplified their lives and agreed to count the numbers so that there was order.
But in this coin, people are calling us to the opposite and want some kind of quality flips ...
It is a step backward, not progress.
But does regression make sense?
Only if its just scam, and all these flips, its just to attract more people for a "fun game" of pictures, but in fact another pump-dump scheme with premine.
Who cares about your Sybil attack ??
How many coins suffer from this attack daily or have suffered before?
Not a single one.
Even Bitcoin created in 2009 doesn't needs this protection...
Sybil attacks are avoided in Bitcoin by requiring block generation ability to be proportional to computational power available through the proof-of-work mechanism. That way, an adversary is limited in how many blocks they can produce. This provides strong cryptographic guarantees of Sybil resilience.
