Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Appeal to review why I was given a negative trust
by
Lauda
on 08/04/2020, 13:11:43 UTC
If only you and your brother (?) use things called "Bitcoin Wallet" or "Cryptocurrency Wallet" where both of you (?) have different address, the whole situation could be avoided.
Too late now for that, is it not? Now is the time to educate.

CryptopreneurBrainboss I was forwarded messages that seem to be genuine. Why are you saying that fiulpro did not send you these documents?
Based on what I have received, I am very strongly urged to believe that the story is true. Combined with this:

My brother does not care much about it , it won't influence him more than me.
He is not even aware of this Smiley
Would you be alright with a resolution where "his account" ("" until there is proof and so forth) is tagged and flagged and yours remains neutral?
Yes ofcourse , this way I can at least enroll and keep earning.
I'm pretty sure other SigCamps have a policy of no users who woke up - it looks like the Bitvest / Plinko SigCamp doesn't have that stipulation.

Another thing is that there currently is no rule on their terms that warned against the use of multi-accounts either, perhaps the user hasn't even violated any of the campaign rule.

Summary: No cheating has occurred (according to Harkorede and Timelord), they are fine with 1 account being neg. rated and/or flagged and the story is very likely to be true. I ask CryptopreneurBrainboss to retract his rating and investigators to dig further into the history two accounts if they are willing.