I have answered that already, so stop steering bullshit and acting like a scam buster when you are behind peanuts. More stupid thing about your witch hunt here is that my mistake was done year's back and you are pretending to protect from nothing.
To prove you to be more dump and double standard here check your own comment on Lauda's red trust due to the merit transactions.
I was tagged once because I have sent merit to post, it is not cool. Good thing is that person who sent me negative removed it.
Why would you merit post where Tec's hare calls lauda scammer and you defend OG when other users call him out and you don't send them merit?
Makes no sense, double standards.
Most of your judgments are double standards here, and in same way you promote abuse. The flag started by Lauda doesn't makes sense or is not warrant. Your move of supporting it makes that more shit.
Nothing hacker1001101001 has done warrants this kind of persistant attention.
I don't know how "persistant" it is but hacker1001101001 sure has done a lot of untrustworthy shit, from plagiarism to ICO bumping to deceptive sockpuppeting and lying about it... if you don't care about that stuff in your guild it doesn't mean that others must not care either.
It looks to me like it's pretty much the opposite than what you're saying, as it often is the case with users that you add to your trust list because they talk/act favorably towards you - it's not so much about Lauda but more about your inability to admit that you're a poor judge of character.
Poor judge of character...hmmm
Are you sure you are right at judging characters here ?
Btw, just due to your ability to judge character here, is it Ok to start a type 1 flag if I think someone has an highly evil character in himself and they are even
high risk to deal with as "personal information" is not safe with them and you could be blackmailed or harassed with it in the future. I even have a case study to put it as a reference to prove personal information in there hand can posses a high risk.