Re antifragile, I believe the concept of "antifragile" can be looked at as a matter of degree.
I pointed that out right away
And Taleb specifically emphasizes that as well. Antifragility is possible only within a range on a certain continuum, and it necessarily comes at the expense of something else, either from inside or outside. This is a crucial point which can be generalized to cryptocurrencies. More specifically, this topic is about finding out and examining the circumstances and conditions under which Bitcoin reveals its antifragile nature, i.e. when it gains from chaos and turmoil out there
N. N. Taleb himself has written that gold is antifragile
That was a loaded question
Really, how can you constructively
disagree with something if you don't even understand the whole idea as this thread clearly proves? Taleb highlights that living systems are the best examples of antifragility. However, he goes on for pages how he couldn't come up with a term to describe this phenomenon when the fittest term (pun intended) is evolutionary? Living systems thrive in chaotic environment since they increase the external entropy by decreasing the own