I believe you have given red to a member previously for calling malboroza out as a scammer supporting piece of shit.
Proof, or it never happened.
It seems chipmixer is paying this member to protect and support scamming by trying to label whistleblowers and trolls
chipmixer certainly has inadvertently brought a motley crew together.
I seem to recall either toaa or ch was calling malboroza out and you gave them red for swearing at malboroza.
If you say it was for something else i will not dispute this now. When I observed it and read the reference that was the conclusion i had drawn. The reference does include some other scammer sympathizers getting whipped on the same post so it may have been for criticizing one of those. Marlboroza appeared to be the primary recipient of the lashing.
Eventually it will become evident that chipmixer inadvertently is motivating and sponsoring some serious scammers and is the core driving force behind a lot of the double standards and 2 tier system that these below average posters need to leverage so they may take these top paying sig spots.
Their "trustworthyness" is gamed and manipulated between them hence why they circle the wagons when members uncover irrefutable scamming by one of the scam gang. They know their individual safety is dependent upon each.
Darkstar must by now be fully aware of their actions. He is reluctant to comment or shrinks away from public debate over his employees conduct. This reflects very poorly upon him. If he thought they were entirely innocent then why not demonstrate this via public debate and analysis.