How did a thread about wrongdoing by
the self-styled hacker who fails basic coding shibboleths become a discussion of whether JayJuanGee has adequately considered the evils of Lauda and nullius.
← Rhetorical question intentionally concluded with a full stop.You simply can not and should not be willing to let more serious wrongdoing from your "friends" go " unnoticed " but then join in with those friends attacking other members for possibly far lesser evils.
You are saying that Lauda and Nullius have done equally or greater evils than hacker, but did I accuse hacker of doing an evil in this thread?
More to the point, even assuming
arguendo that I am
the most evil person on this forum in the world (and Lauda is #3sorry, kitty, Hitler is still #2; try harder), what has this to do with the
bad doings by hacker1001101001 that are evidenced in this thread?
Objectively, my and Laudas allegedly most-evil doings would not excuse hackers allegedly possibly far lesser evils.
Of course, such diversionary tactics are just that.
I have actually found some members to be quite annoyed at some of my posts in terms of their length and sometimes even positions that I have taken on various matters... or maybe even annoyed by my tone, and other styles that can sometimes be unnecessarily confrontational. Some people seem to like my posting style, and other do not.
Some people dislike reading; others, to the contrary. Unnecessarily confrontational is another way of saying, no bullshit. At least if you disagree with me, I know that you will explain substantively and without beating around the bush, instead of just tossing off insults, snarky one-liners, or animated GIFs.
My strongest motive in coming to the forum in the past 6 years has been to research and share ideas in regards to bitcoin,
I miss talking about Bitcoin.
That is completely off-topic here, so I will only provided a cross-reference to
bonesjonesreturns claims that Nobody has dared try to refute the evidence, with a very short excerpt:
http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5417/54171749.html[...]
[...]
The nonsense directed at me is even more ridiculous: OP paints me as a hypocrite because in 2020, I am friends with someone who said some things disagreeable to me in 2014, and later changed her mind and said things that I absolutely agree with. Say what? That is so wrong that its
not even wrong. It does not even make sense.
(For the record, the
only altcoins that I myself have
ever possessed in any amount are Zcash, where I got my start (
LOL, Lauda), and Monero. Better idea: Improve Bitcoin privacy, and transact on the Lightning Network.)
Now we see nullius the double standards hypocrite bitch of lauda. Who is supporting lauda and running around looking like a lauda is trying to punish another member for a similar but less serious crime?? This person is not lying like Lauda?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231181.0First of all, I disagree that thats less serious. Fork attacks on Bitcoin are the most serious altcoin scam of all; and jbreher is a highly experienced user who continues repeating objectively false misinformation that has been debunked to him numerous times over the years. Second of all, I never accused jbreher of a
crime: I mean that in the sense that I would not lock him in prison for his forum posts, if I had the power to do so. I do think that many of his posts are dishonest and damaging, and people should be
warned about that.
If jbreher turns around and starts repudiating what he said before, honestly and with full understandingif he becomes one of the most active opponents of the same lies and FUD that he has been spreadingthen I will buy him a (virtual) beer! You may quote me on that.
Anyway, that is irrelevant to Lauda.
Not taking it up in a thread about hacker1001101001.
A special mention to JayJuanGee... you have the patience of a saint. I mean the way you meticulously answer the trolls with point-by-point clarity is very impressive even though you probably know you are engaging with trolls and attention seeking deluded individuals/groups.... your way to engage them and manage them is without doubt impressive. No matter how much you address them they have their own ulterior motives and sometimes hidden sometimes overt agendas but you still present your points and answers in the most professional manner imaginable.
Agreed.