You know what's funny? It's funny how Nutildah is so blinded by his 5-6 year long rage-on for Bryce, and his constant frustration at how there's literally no scam in Tao, and that Bryce has the approval of the government regulators that Nutildah hates, that he jumped the gun and blew his load over nothing.   

I mean, one would expect that after all of this long experience shitposting on Bitcointalk and posting his articles for Coinclarity that he'd understand that the process of cloning one open source crypto from another generally starts with duplicating the repo and doing a mass search and replace of the name and coin symbol.

And in his feverish eagerness to joyously shout "sCaM!11" and post this thread, Nut didn't consider that maybe this alleged "plagiarism" might simply be literally how you fork a new crypto. Just a work in process, and that the readme file simply hasn't been edited yet because there were more interesting and important steps to take first, and it's not like the new network has been publicly launched yet.

Guess he didn't think of this much more reasonable explanation, but instead attacked and dragged people's reputation.


That said, I have a question. Since you try to present yourself and the accounts you're aligned with as "scam busters," I wonder if you'd comment on the ethics and honesty of using sockpuppet accounts to your advantage.

What do you think of using multiple accounts to brigade a thread and constantly harass other users? And what do you think of let's say, using a high profile account to endorse and support an ICO while secretly being a member of the ICO team?

I wonder if you'll actually respond to this question, or if you'll just delete this comment as you've done with other comments in this thread? Let's see.