So in summary, you don't like his opinion?
I think liking/not liking someone's opinion is sufficient criteria for deciding who to include/exclude from my trust list, no?
Can you explain the difference. I mean your poo poohing seems worse?
If you don't know the difference in gravity between calling for someone's death and any of the other things you mentioned, I can't help you.
So you were poo pooing scamming and racism? Poo. Pooing those is ok.
I think the point is that they didnt perceive the noobs childish death threat as a credible real life threat. Like you say scamming is probably not scamming and to say that it is is trolling
Or that racism is funny because he does not mean it because he is white?
Those things are okay to poo poo
I mean thats the point of poo pooing right ? You don't beleive it is that real or credible ?it is not serious?
If you really thought that pharmacist was a racist or lauda was a scammer you would not poo pooh it would you?
It's I guess about perception of how real something seems to you.
Perhaps people make miscalculations or maybe they dont?
Lauda is a scammer but did that guy kill anyone yet? Who got it more wrong?
That is the point..he perhaps didn't think it was a serious death wish just like you didnt think it is serious to scam or that pharmacist was not really a racist. Its the perception of the real intent. If it is not serious then it is not serious right?
I don't agree with any of it personally.
Hate speech, scamming, stated death wishes....... possible ico bumping ?
Poo poo
I see a suggestion of exclusion punishment. I do not feel it is consistent or fair.