Lol at this scammer lauda.
He is clearly saying i will keep the red tag while you are part of the objective standards guild and disagreeing with me. Very clearly this thread is simply the trust system being used by proven scammers to punish those that dare speak out.
Malboroza is claiming early in this thread " soon i will add a type 1 flag."
This thread is another clear attempt by lauda, malboroza and their new pervy old panting bitch nullius and the very willing scam facilitator for pay nutildah to dig up some possible dirt on hacker0101000101 because he disagreed with lauda the scammer and wants objective standards to ensure the fair treatment of every member here.
This thread needs context. As the old desperate perv nullius says context can be important. Go read his atriz vs alia posts
I would advise hacker to tell the scammer supporter malboroza and the other scammers here to keep their questions for later.
I would say to malboroza i will answer you after you answer my questions on supporting scammers like lauda would lied and shilled for a proven scam until he dumped his bags.
You answer questions first marlboroza then hacker can answer yours. We will compare who needs excluding and red more urgently.
After reading more through the pages here you no need to longer avoid my questions for clarity of the central purpose of this thread.
You are clearly using it as a tool to garner support for your double standards punishment of hacker10000111
Trying to avoid others bringing context for your given and promised forthcoming punishment of hacker01010 is dishonest. You are trying to hide and obscure your double standards and your true motivation for raising this issue at this time.
Nullius is a creep. Nobody can take this coward seriously. I am enjoying reading the alia debacle. Nullius is a creepy predator type and since he feels that empathy is disgusting and wrong, that together with obviously a predatory creepy old perv nature is quite a dangerous combo. The reader should investigate this idiot and new female members should be extra cautious. I think his past conduct is actually a cause for concern.
Even possible or probable ico bumping is way below the level of danger posed by this motley crew of scammers, scammer supporters and creepy old cowards pervs who claim empathy is worthy of punishment.
Let me restate. In the context of the others you shelter and support then hacker is a far less danger to the members here based on the evidence here. I find the timing and the lack of concern for more serious dangers here very telling
Marlboroza spend your energy hunting your scammer friends or alts first like lauda and tman and nutildah. After that you can pretend to want to save the board from.ico bumpers. Also keep an eye on nullius if any young female scammers come along he will perhaps support them too if they just talk-him-off verbally since he is too old for the real thing.
Or maybe he tells them he only enjoys verbal stim until....well it does not bare thinking about
There dear pervo coward nullius you got a mention
The more I read of this thread about hacker0101000101 the more I understand your reluctance to state its purpose malboroza.
Clearly context is very important here whilst you and the other toadies and creeps discuss fair and consistent punishments and even possible paths to " forgiveness "
Carot and stick
This is not to say i would condone ico bumping only that we must place it into full context of other possible dangers here before we decide suitable action and the order of actions. We want to take care of the most serious evils first.
What a waste of time using the unIGNORE on him to read this waffle and then to re-add him to my IGNORE list.
Is this the best they can come up with? They think they are insulting or attacking users that are trying to uphold the morals of this forum but they are just a group of misguided attention seeking users that have ulterior motives.
Just the idea, just the notion that a user such as
hacker0101000101 who self-admitted taking payment to post fake information in ICO ANN threads and has thus far an unknown number of alt-accounts could in any way be compared to marlboroza or Lauda (who have given so much to the forum over the years) is absurd.
Sure some of us might not be liked by everybody but when it comes to contributing to this forum in a positive manner, outside that small political group of disgruntled attention seekers, it would be mightily difficult to find anybody (with any serious standing within this forum) who would claim
hacker0101000101 is bringing more to this forum than others yet those regular suspect alt-accounts and deeply troubled users continue trying to create animosity here by deliberately closing their eyes to the obvious.
Instead of holding
hacker0101000101 to account they continue to deflect attention away from him, they harbour and shelter him, like he does them akin to bosom-buddies just because they have personal vendettas against users such as Lauda and marlboroza.