Hello,
I just recently invested some LTC (about 9% of the bankroll)
For the wager competitions : why can't it be 50% of usual house-edge to the players/25% for investors/25% for owners with investors at risk. I guess the goal of the whole investing system for the owners is to prevent the risk of players winning bigs amounts, this risk is even bigger for you during wagering compatitions where big amounts are played so i dont really understand why you would assume this risk while the 50% given to the players could just be taken from both. Or is it because you can't cover your exepenses with 25% of the houseedge?
My guess is that many investors wouldn't be willing to go down to an effective 25% of the edge; I personally wouldn't. 50% is the bare minimum I'd take. We saw with MoneyPot how bad 30% to investors could be, especially with short term variance.