Cross-reference: Appeal of Ban Appeal: hacker1001101001 spammer-sockpuppet menagerie.
Obligatory link explaining the subtle abuse of symbols in the title of my hereby post. The self-styled wannabe hacker fails basic coding shibboleths.
`1001101001` is 10 bits. Therefore,
from the set of all people who make Internet usernames consisting of a simple English word appended with ten binary digits, there is a 1/1024 chance that the digits could just be a coincidence. Stop pumping conspiracy theories, marlboroza!
Why the fuck are all these ICO bump accounts connected to hacker?
I am repeating my clear explanation to this here. ( Could be my last time )
Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me. I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even unethical for me to comment about others accounts and there address transactions with one of my address regarding such type of service. But I am not involved in any such type of further activities from this accounts as I don't control any of them. I would also like to assure everyone here that I am not involved in bumping now and not willing to facilitate it in future.
Sorry, but I am out of this attacks and repeating my answers again so, I feel I had enough of your dump Questions/Answer sessions.
Quoted for total lack of remorse, and hypocritical self-righteousness about a purported ethical duty to protect the confidentiality of fraud spammers. Honour among thieves?
Reductio ad absurdum: Yes, officer, I was involved in the drug-dealing and stolen-goods fencing businesses and had many other users working around me. I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even
unethical for me to comment... LOL.