This... as if you don't know I am responding directly to your quote.
...However it would likely be a temporary ban anyway so the point of the OP is kinda moot.
Ah, this is one of those things where you're explaining to other people that the meaning of their posts is the opposite of what the actual words say.
If hacker1001101001's posts violate rules they should be reported and if he deserves a temp-ban because of that - he should get it (or maybe get "time served" if the moderators are so inclined). Not because someone posted a wall of text arguing for double jeopardy. Which part of this is too complicated for you?