Sorry but you are mistaken DarkStar_ the motive behind the post in this thread and all the other posts in all the other threads is because I was the loudest voice of a handful of voices that were advocating extreme caution from the days of the ICO yet sadly many his signature campaign participants drowned out those concerns with walls of text.
My post (which you replied to) was not designed to clearly attack serial scammer Dean Nolan. On the contrary if I wanted to attack him there were plenty of ways to do it and plenty of posts I have made about him in the past have clearly beyond any doubt unequivocally attacked him because of he is a scammer and a thief - not for any other reason.
When you say regardless of what actually happened the most important part should be trying to get those were scammed to be made whole again, that part I agree with in principle. Where we disagree is that the one who scammed investors and legitimate winners of wagers and scammed ICO investors and scammed BKB token holders and scammed BKT token holders and scammed the bankroll investors in October 2019 out of the final $400,000 worth of bitcoin by blaming it on an imaginary hack was serial scammer Dean Nolan. In his private Telegram for investors he even had the nerve to ask for more investment when he initially promised he would not. He threatened to close the group down and go back to a 9-5 job too saying was living a hand to mouth existence BUT where are the USD$ millions he stole?
How on earth could the proprietors of a business such as Bitsler be negotiating any sort of deal with the scammer that caused all the damage? It is beyond preposterous. When trying to say a third party such as Bitsler will pay $18,000 towards 250 ex-betking (or alleged ex-betking) players, it allows for just 250 new sign-ups for Bitsler at a cost of $18,000 as well as other caveats who will probably end up betting more than the free $250 over the course of a few months there Bitsler will be getting their $18,000 within no time.
If Bitsler really were interested about those that were victims of betking in a wider-ranging manner of helping, they could have completely disassociated with the person central to the betking scam which sadly cost many people a lot of money.
I am 100% in agreement with BAC here.
Serial scammer Dean Nolan stolen over $400,000 worth of Bitcoin investor bankroll and blamed it on an imaginary hack. Then closed down the failing betking website. On that basis alone Bitsler should not be associating itself with betking regardless of who will benefit in the end. Add to that all the other issues such as the millions of USD$ that serial scammer Dean Nolan stole from the ICO and post-ICO still has not been located.
Sadly a very bad move by Bitsler by associating with betking in any way shape or form.
You clearly just want to attack Dean (probably deserved) without caring for the people who actually lost money to the hack (real or not). Regardless of what actually happened, the most important part should be trying to get those who were scammed to be made whole. I can't believe that you're advocating for Bitsler to not refund legitimate players that happened to lose money because of Dean.