Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia
by
bonesjonesreturns
on 18/04/2020, 23:51:02 UTC
That is your own interpretation of me being fraudulent despite me not intending to scam anyone around

Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me.

I'll probably bookmark this.

That doesn't proof anything other than you being biased in your judgements and trying to ignore and even wrongly troll my statements.
So it is trolling now, not fake review ico service business any more.  Cool

Actually, the whole topic proves my good judgement, I suspected what you are, you denied it, I investigated it and I proved my judgement is good. You, on the other hand, showed that you are one big liar.

Is malboroza ok? He gets fixated on things.

You answer him and refute his points clearly but he just keeps on asking the same answered questions and making the same mistakes?

In this case though he is just moaning about people that apparently tell lies although openly supporting a proven liar and scammer like lauda.

When you present irrefutable evidence of laudas lies and scamming marlboroza says that is trolling?

Better to just refuse to answer his repetitive previously answered questions.
If he is unable to comprehend the answers already given in this thread many times then what good can come of answering him again.
He is either lacking the capacity to understand or is trolling.

I guess you could try one more time or just paste the link.

The guild is for those that wish to adopt objective standards for the trust system. Marlboroza could even join but he will not because he does not want objective standards to ensure all members are treated equally.  Malboroza wants to support proven scammers pals of his but punish ico bumpers he does not like..

Dishonest double standards scum bag.