It's a pretty strong assumption to make that price would be entirely unaffected by something like 20-25 % increase in supply.. Annually.
For two years I believe, then the intention is to have the DEX fees cover this. And it also fails to consider that there would be many investors who would not just dump all that Tao on the market but use it as delegates and/or stockpile enough to run another masternode.
But of course you're not only commenting without knowing that, or ignoring it, but you're looking at it in isolation without the rest of the ecosystem being considered.
Oh the docs? The docs which are also still mostly unattributed verbatim copies of Tomo documentation?
A) it's already well established and even specifically disclaimed in the introduction that it's a work in progress
B) you're lying again, all the attribution is still there in the commits
C) if you're implying the documentation should be rewritten from scratch just to please you, that's just dumb and you should feel silly for suggesting it
You know what isn't allowed, according to the license of that?
Changing the copyright notice.
You can do basically whatever you like with it, as long as you leave the copyright notice intact.
Guess what Bryce didn't do?
If you're referring to
https://docs.tao.network/products/taoissuer/termofcondition/ then it's been fixed. Thank you for helping out! See? You can be useful! Good for you, little buddy!
