Re: Chipmixer sponsor dangerous untrustworthy members and Racists and unfair treat?
That seems to support exactly what I said.
He is correctly pointing out marlboroza is a scammer supporting non achieving loser. Which he is. You left red trust for someone telling the truth about malboroza.
There is no person I am fighting. I am pushing for fair and transparent standards that ensure all members are treated equally.
The end of double standards.
Perhaps calling out means something different to you that is where the confusion is.
Malboroza seems to be a prime lauda supporter and pusher of double standards.
He is correctly pointing out marlboroza is a scammer supporting non achieving loser. Which he is. You left red trust for someone telling the truth about malboroza.
There is no person I am fighting. I am pushing for fair and transparent standards that ensure all members are treated equally.
The end of double standards.
Perhaps calling out means something different to you that is where the confusion is.
Malboroza seems to be a prime lauda supporter and pusher of double standards.
I'm just taking your comment here as I've got some interesting questions to ask you.
What are you up to? Is it that you're not fine with the people here who are advertising Chipmixer signature? It's been 3 years (if not less) for them with these members and I've also been a member of it for around 2 years and never had such issues, nor am I so badly dissatisfied like you. And you're only pointing out Marlboroza which makes it clear that you don't have issues with ^the rest of the Chipmixer army^?
I've seen the case with Marlboroza where I think there was no foul play done from their end (I'm not supporting anyone but speaking what I understood after investigating about the deep truth to the best of my knowledge).
I don't get this Lauda part, that even if someone likes/supports any member on the forum that you don't like, what makes you feel so bad that you just write it out and call out someone for their following deeds? Also don't understand the "double standards" part, can you explain what exactly it is in your views?
I have no issues with chipmixer. I have volunteered to wear chipmixer and all earnings are donated directly to good causes.
What if a member is supporting and protecting a proven scammer?
What if members try to trust abuse whistleblowing on scammers?
Why did you leave chipmixer?