Re: Nullius the scammer supporter and dumb fuck wishes to excuse scamming come here.
You are saying there that for him to demonstrate or prove you have control of zorobek account then he needs video evidence?
I will not quote that entire thing here because it off topic but that is the discussion I am talking about.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5127540.msg50571141#msg50571141
But the posts above are relevant.
Tell me what you mean if you are not saying video evidence is a requirement of account control?
Or just in your case?
No, no no. You said I asked for video evidence that zorrobek is my alt account. This post proofs that I didn't ask for evidence that zorrobek is my alt account, it shows proof that I asked QS to provide me proof that I deleted post I will not quote that entire thing here because it off topic but that is the discussion I am talking about.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5127540.msg50571141#msg50571141
But the posts above are relevant.
Tell me what you mean if you are not saying video evidence is a requirement of account control?
Or just in your case?
Stop changing subject, provide proofs from topic! Lauda==nullius is what you claim, either edit topic so we could discuss other relevant things from topic or provide proofs to back up you claim!