Re-reading the logs of organized troll attacks which were scrolling quite fast in the public Discord channel:
Crypto_Gods:
if you guys ever held real jobs, you would understand no company discloses bugs, issues, etc they are facing. But then there are sour patches who once they get fired they only show what they want to show to make others believers.
....
If you, Energi Core, wanted to tell that it's because of a security issue in the chain, then:
...
On behalf of legitimate coin owners, I request Energi Core to immediately stop the chain and nail to the best known block like it was done for Gen 2.Otherwise, it is a reckless attitude to coin owners which may face issues, but then would have issues proving that they are legitimate owners.
Energi Core wants to be the plaintiff, the court and the police in the same face. I am banned from all other ways to communicate to discuss the problem.
They have already drained more than 160k of someones funds into the Compensation Fund:
https://explorer.energi.network/address/0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000318/transactionsHave they gotten a court order for that? What court accepts a shill BVI company with shill beneficiaries? What kind of lawyer would participate in such scam on behalf of Energi Core?
I see that something is going on with the BlockReward contract (
https://explorer.energi.network/address/0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000310/coin_balances) which sometimes lefts some rewards not distributed, but that does not explain closed deposits.
Worse, it is an exact sign that the chain must be stopped immediately to find a solution!Do you, Energi Core, have any proof that coin owners are at risk to keep the deposits closed other than because of the chain-splits caused by staking power centralization? Do you block large coin owners to keep self centralized and do all the staking for interested parties? How much profit do exchanges get from staking and sharing 0% to users? Is that the reason why they violate own policies on delisting coins which fail to provide a solution for more than a month? There is no swap period with the Migration feature.
I believe the other issue your are fighting with is a memo left by me before leaving regarding nuances of Blacklist drainage and consequences of ownership of tokens in the smart contracts like MasternodeToken. The changes were postponed due to the code freeze for the core consensus logic.
However, it is not an excuse to delay deposits. P.S. Have anyone asked CoinMarketCap about what they think about the situation? I have already contacted them and explained in details with proofs. Try to get an answer yourself, and be surprised.