To jayjuangee

We seem to be disagreeing on a few key aspects.

1. When crying for a specific punishment of a member that context is relevant to ensure the punishment being called for is consistent and fair. I say it is 100% essential. You say this is irrelevant I dont think this is true.

2. That the statements I have used to describe lauda, nullius or any other of the scammer supporting gang are not compelling or that they sound bogus. Please pick 1 specifically and we can address it. Irrefutable evidence of wrong doing is there.

3. Many have noted the obsession nullius has with lauda.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225450.msg53957372#msg53957372

This is very similar to his pattern with alia.

The guy is creepy. Lauda sitting their flirting with him in private is gross.

Anyway. It is clear these scammers and scammer supporters ( I dont say jayjuangee is a scammer supporter although calling irrefutable evidence of scamming " nonsense" is something he needs to consider more carefully. )  are terrified of having their behaviors compared to hacker0101000101 so a fair consistent punishment for each of them can be handed out.

It is also clear this determination to see hacker punished comes as he speaks out against lauda.

We must not allow scammers and scammer supporters to use the trust system or appeal to admin to punish those that speak against them or whistleblow on their scamming. 

When any member calls for anothers punishment they may want to consider the passage

Matthew 7:5
"Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye"

I don't think they are seeing clearly. I am merely trying to help them focus and see the entire picture here.

Lol at nullius coming out of retirement to red tag for " empathy"  while protecting and supporting a scamming drug like lauda.
We should take him seriously? Lol after already facilitating his other teenie female scammer alia.
Guy is a clear danger to this forum.

I apologise for being the only person that wants to see things fair and consistent here.
Siding with people you consider to have the upper hand currently is easy.

I stick to what I have said since the start

Hacker0101000101 is less of a concern to this forum than those trying to get hacker0101000101 banned.
His crimes seem less ruthless and malicious and he is not using the trust system or appeals to admin to silence those whistleblowing.
He is not on DT and is on a 2 year sig ban. Any further punishment can wait until we ensure these scammers are banned or can never leverage the trust system ever again to facilitate scamming.

/ thread.