Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie
Boldface is “hacker’s” (!):
So are you claiming that you have been involved in a bumping service where dozens on accounts are involved in the service itself yet you only know your name?
Sharp eyes there. Within the four corners of the same post, the n00b s’kiddie “hacker” simultaneously said in substantial essence: “I don’t know, and I won’t spill what I know!”
You know what is said about honour among thieves—or the lack thereof, which police always find useful for cracking down on ordinary crime (in contradistinction to high-level organized crime, which basically does counterintelligence cat-and-mouse games with the police; and unlike ideologically motivated dissidents driven by high ideals, who are obviously not criminals at all). “hacker’s” hypocritical gab about ethics is just blowing smoke.
The balance of probabilities is that “hacker” would rat out his allegedly extant buddies in about three seconds, if he thought it paid for him to do so. That he does not, indicates that probably either (H) there are no such third parties—they are all his alts, or (T) he is still doing business with them—not making a clean break from that underworld.
I mark those scenarios (H) and (T) respectively, because I am pretty much considering them to have coin-flip probabilities at this point. What is improbable and implausible is that he is Doing The Right Thing in any way.
Moreover, at the very least, the self-styled “hacker” obviously knows at least some past and/or current information on who was/is paying him upstream. If he had even a scintilla of sincerity in this:
...then his ethical concern would be to coöperate with investigations of parties who use spam to advertise, and worse, typically use spam to pump-and-dump scam “investments”!
I see that “bonesjones” is no longer interested in the personal life of the Phantom. What a pity.
When will they learn to stop trying to mess with me?
Are you trying to imply ban as some 3rd degree torture treatment so that I would spill out... ? I don't have any internal knowledge about those services and the user's behind it. I am sure there are many people's around the forum anonymously offering such services which is out of anyone's reach, not even mine.
So are you claiming that you have been involved in a bumping service where dozens on accounts are involved in the service itself yet you only know your name?
Sharp eyes there. Within the four corners of the same post, the n00b s’kiddie “hacker” simultaneously said in substantial essence: “I don’t know, and I won’t spill what I know!”
For a thief it is unethical to disclose the names of his accomplices or his subordinates from his perspective.
You know what is said about honour among thieves—or the lack thereof, which police always find useful for cracking down on ordinary crime (in contradistinction to high-level organized crime, which basically does counterintelligence cat-and-mouse games with the police; and unlike ideologically motivated dissidents driven by high ideals, who are obviously not criminals at all). “hacker’s” hypocritical gab about ethics is just blowing smoke.
The balance of probabilities is that “hacker” would rat out his allegedly extant buddies in about three seconds, if he thought it paid for him to do so. That he does not, indicates that probably either (H) there are no such third parties—they are all his alts, or (T) he is still doing business with them—not making a clean break from that underworld.
I mark those scenarios (H) and (T) respectively, because I am pretty much considering them to have coin-flip probabilities at this point. What is improbable and implausible is that he is Doing The Right Thing in any way.
Moreover, at the very least, the self-styled “hacker” obviously knows at least some past and/or current information on who was/is paying him upstream. If he had even a scintilla of sincerity in this:
I was/am pretty much against spamming on the forum and even discourage working of such misleading services.
...then his ethical concern would be to coöperate with investigations of parties who use spam to advertise, and worse, typically use spam to pump-and-dump scam “investments”!
pushing double standards and fake concern for the forum whilst scamming and milking it for every satoshi they can get
Can you say double standards?
I was/am pretty much against spamming on the forum and even discourage working of such misleading services.
Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me. I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even unethical for me to comment about others accounts and there address transactions with one of my address regarding such type of service.
Are you trying to imply ban as some 3rd degree torture treatment so that I would spill out... ?
Says the king of double standards fake
How much more double standards crap [...] do we have to listen to.
Now, where are the people who are so obsessed with “double standards” and hypocrisy?
[—more dumb rote insistence that staying on topic is “running away from” off-topic discussions, all of which have been anyway repeatedly rehashed myriad times in Reputation—]
I see that “bonesjones” is no longer interested in the personal life of the Phantom. What a pity.
When will they learn to stop trying to mess with me?