Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie
Done yet with glorifying me to the point of cult worship? I see that you are not, Mr “bonesjones”. Thanks.
Forking hell, Jay. You are not “objective”:
The rule applies only to Lauda, Lauda’s friends, anybody who does not dislike Lauda, and people who dislike Lauda but also dislike persons approved by the forum’s resident troll-guild. Anything else is “double standards”.
It is ipso facto trust abuse for Lauda to leave positive, negative, and neutral ratings. If you disagree, then you have “double standards”.
And this applies only to real or imaginary wrongdoing by Lauda and/or anybody who does not hate Lauda with extreme prejudice:
To apply that to n00b s’kiddie spammer-plagiarist “hacker” is to have “double standards”.
Got it?
Only yesterday, I glanced through one of “bonesjones’” prolific self-moderated smear-attack threads that I had been ignoring. This fairly exemplifies “very bad underlying theories of colluding and just great stretches of imagination”:
~
So no proof?
As I have said there is nò proof
Ok, so baseless accusation.
Really, you don't know who was running the spam group? How exactly did you get told which threads to shitbump? A dead drop under a park bench?
No, that’s the dead drop where he picks up the brown paper bags full of blockchain-traceable shitcoin payments from sources whose other payments probably could in turn be traced to payments to other spam bumpers. The dead drop for spam orders is, of course, under a table at the Green Midget Cafe.
Quote from: Nietzsche
Nicht durch Zorn, sondern durch Lachen tödtet man.
Forking hell, Jay. You are not “objective”:
I did not know that there was a rule against wearing a signature.
The rule applies only to Lauda, Lauda’s friends, anybody who does not dislike Lauda, and people who dislike Lauda but also dislike persons approved by the forum’s resident troll-guild. Anything else is “double standards”.
Also, if you are accusing someone of abusing the trust system, then you have to go beyond merely making allegations that someone has been using that trust system to mark people with positive, negative and neutral ratings
It is ipso facto trust abuse for Lauda to leave positive, negative, and neutral ratings. If you disagree, then you have “double standards”.
And this applies only to real or imaginary wrongdoing by Lauda and/or anybody who does not hate Lauda with extreme prejudice:
Even 1 damning fact of scamming or financially motivated wrong doing is enough.
To apply that to n00b s’kiddie spammer-plagiarist “hacker” is to have “double standards”.
Got it?
Disgraceful.
and lauda's conduct is not even the topic of this thread in that regard,..... well you know that, but you want to make it part of the topic because of your stretch of an idea that there is one gang that is against another gang or some continued amorphous concept, and such theory seems to even start with very bad underlying theories of colluding and just great stretches of imagination as far as I can see as soon as I start to read some of your claims, they just go all over the place with lots of ongoing false equivalences and poor logic even if you might present a potentially damning fact or two that might be correct from time to time.
Only yesterday, I glanced through one of “bonesjones’” prolific self-moderated smear-attack threads that I had been ignoring. This fairly exemplifies “very bad underlying theories of colluding and just great stretches of imagination”:
Nullius this alt of lauda
Any proofs to back up this statement?I don't have any internal knowledge about those services and the user's behind it.
Really, you don't know who was running the spam group? How exactly did you get told which threads to shitbump? A dead drop under a park bench?
No, that’s the dead drop where he picks up the brown paper bags full of blockchain-traceable shitcoin payments from sources whose other payments probably could in turn be traced to payments to other spam bumpers. The dead drop for spam orders is, of course, under a table at the Green Midget Cafe.
Just when I think your excuses can't get any more cringy.