It would have been a good idea to link this proof in the PM you've sent me you know, would have avoided me to try to find something proving your words.

I could return you the opposite statement: You've been paid for a year and a half without problem so it is pretty unreasonable and disproportionate to make a fuss for such a small amount.

You've technically broken the rule as you've changed your signature in a week cycle. Still your case was in discussion as you were a good member. Ethan asked me to include you in this week payment which is quite nice of him I think, but it's not unreasonable and disproportionate for us to take a week to discuss about you and to include you in the weekly payment and not make a special payment just for you no?

So yeah, you were a good member, it was nice working with you, but I don't like that you start being so aggressive because I haven't answered your PM in the last 3 days. I've managed and paid you every week for a year and a half, maybe at least give us a week before making public claims no?

---

Additionnaly, I've been authorized by Ethan to open the positions of Bitmover and Bitcoinclubgirl. There will be no enrollement period because I was aksed to chose someone "if there was someone worth engaging". Which means I'm going to keep the slots opened until someone can assume the position.

Have a nice day everyone.