Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Craig W. only claims to be Satoshi, because he knows the real Satoshi is dead?
by
DooMAD
on 27/04/2020, 10:59:51 UTC
⭐ Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
Sure, but there might be 'no other'

Doesn't matter.  A lack of presence by satoshi doesn't mean we need a cheap imitation knockoff:

[interviewer] OK, let’s pretend the real SN is alive and watching all this happen. Why doesn’t he step in?

[interviewee] Presuming the real Satoshi Nakamoto is still alive, I don’t think he’s bothered too much by Craig Wright. Just like the Bitcoin OGs are totally not bothered by Craig either. Because Craig is just one of the few handfuls of Faketoshis that we’ve seen over Bitcoin’s lifespan.

Let’s be honest, Craig Wright is pretty irrelevant in the grand Bitcoin scheme.

If you bother to read:
https://modernconsensus.com/commentary/the-case-against-craig-wright-part-i-2009-2011/
https://modernconsensus.com/people/exclusive-the-case-against-craig-wright-part-ii-2012-to-present/

and the twitter posts linked within:
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1225479475456024585
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1209858790113337344

and the author's website:
https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/fraud-timeline.html

You should have all the evidence you could ever need.  But instead, you continue to make yourself look a complete fool by continuing to support an exposed fraud.


Wanting original Satoshi Version to run as set up and in stone by Satoshi is pretty much aligned with Satoshi, isn't it ?

Attempting to secure 6000 patents based on Bitcoin and blockchain is not "aligned with satoshi".  The conman wants fiat, you poor, deluded muppet.  He couldn't give less of a shit about Bitcoin.  It's just something he can exploit for gains in his preferred national currency.  You are blind if you can't recognise that.