kudos to you for staying positive. but i can't put my trust into a crypto project where you have to be afraid of somebody finding your addresses because they can simply block them if they don't like what you have to say or if you criticize their cult leader.


YAWN


in that case why don't you enlighten me and tell me: why is every transaction other than one to an exchange address fine? try to answer my question sincerely with your own words. you can't, because there is no actual explanation given in the medium article nor statement here. if the team you hold in such high regards really cared about 'security' and their users funds then why do they allow 'normal' transactions between addresses? where is the increased risk in a transaction to an exchange address in comparison to a normal wallet address?
seriously i want you to think about this and not just repeat tommys marketing babble. what is the justification for this? i'm really interested to see what you come up with and btw save me your answer if it's only going to be 'reading comprehension, you're to dumb to understand it i won't waste my time on you HURR DURR' that shits WEAK AF


okay fair, you're just naive then but what do i care like i said screaming FAKE ACCOUNTS doesn't refute any of the accusations and is just a weak attempt to change the subject.

on that matter: let's focus on the actual posts from andy and and not further derail this thread.
post numbers #501, #504, #505 and #514 are very important and still haven't been properly refuted by Energi Crypto, please read them if you just joined the thread
Their response [#532] does NOT provide an explanation for the accusations he very clearly laid bare. instead their response is an accumulation of self congratulatory marketing phrases and smear attacks on their former employees reputation. once again they ignore the actual accusations and fail to give proper explanations for their behavior.