As long as we give attention to this stupid Faketoshi, he will just continue to create claims like this as long as he is alive for sure.
His coin is a trash making him a trash too. His claims are all false and he is just making himself a clown in crypto world

. I don't know how can he manage to do things like this when he already knows that there isn't that many people who are believing him.
Craig Wright made the majority of the posts on bitcointalk.org. Writing style comparison examples have clearly proven this point in the past.
Proof that you are completely clueless (and/or complicit !?) @MicroGuy ...
Craig Wright (has categorically proven he is NOT satoshi with this blog post) by stating and claiming that the real 'satoshi' did not post on BitcoinTalk.org (bitcoin.org / smf) when quite clearly satoshi did post to this very forum!
Empirical sources of evidence i.e. blockchain (timechain) timestamps prove CSW to be incorrect.
CSW has completely backfired on himself here! Bitcoin's (BTC's) financial cryptography (hard verifiable facts) prove him to be a liar.
CSW has not signed a single publicly verifiable message to date and he has only provided excuses in a court of law, along with proven to be false, backdated 'evidence'.
He can't even sign with the known 'Satoshi Nakamoto' PGP key (let alone on the Bitcoin blockchain) ...
"Signed and Verifiable messages in Bitcoin are very easy. The real Satoshi could also prove identity via PGP.
- https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/
At the base of the page, see PGP Key; Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc :
- https://bitcointalk.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc
Financial privacy is not broken using PGP.
5/12"-
https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222879720250990592Look at the base of the archived page, its the same PGP key.
The PGP key is cryptographically signed for the satoshi email address in the whitepaper.
Its the same key satoshi posted on this forum ...
-
https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc 