sounds like they added 750,000(clients) and what was supposed to be 100,000(company), but they saw 1,000,000.  Sad that armchair bloggers are more scrupulous than MSM and have been for some time. 

My solution: (Steal this idea)

Someone build a "skin" plug-in that sits on top of the articles, people can use the skin to rate sentences one by one. True, False, half-truth, unverifiable, etc..  the aggregated input is then calculated, and the plug-in will display the community consensus on the quality of the article.  You can look up authors past scores. You can see the score for a single sentence.  Contributors would get compensated by revenue generated by ads the plug-in presents while editing, maybe some contributors input is worth more than others.  If only there were some mechanism or system out there to handle the micropayments for people doing the work.. hmmm.....if only....