And what does everyone think about a more top heavy points structure 15-12-10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1? Helps the guys in the midfield separate from each other if they manage to get a more than decent finish. Also helps with reducing ties, makes comebacks possible right until the last round, and missing out on one or two games won't hurt you that much if you think you can finish ITM a few times.
Please consider the players at the bottom.
its really depressing to have 0 points.
even the odd point would be an ego boost for us.
Why not make a system that rewards every player?
lol, boost your ego by winning some hands and taking down a tourney. this is poker, not a pity party!

that said, i have mixed feelings about changing the points structure. my brain is a little fried at the moment and i'm not certain how would it affect variance overall. i need to see some other opinions.