No answers to the tough questions huh? Just insults? You are only insulting yourself bud by not answering. Showing your true colors.
Everyone can see you for what you really are. Ask a question that does not gel with your agenda, start the insults and diversions. lol.
Thanks for proving our point.
the answer to all those forecasts is that they are simply out of date. Socrates updates the array/reversals every day/week/month and you want to cling to a static blog post.
New reversals are generated if new highs/lows are made, which of course are not going to be included. That is the mistake that is being made so there is nothing to address and those blog posts prove nothing at all. That destroys all so called claims about failed forecasts posted here. The private blog of course would of included updates but that is conveniently never mentioned. They have already come to their conclusion why should they bother looking any deeper into it.
Armstrong claims to be able to forecast long-term trends, years or decades before they happen. Now, Gumbi says that these forecasts are simply out of date.
If I continue to change my forecasts all the way dynamically, I can get everything right. I will just stay behind current events by 1 day, and everyday I will come out and say that "see, I predicted the exact things yesterday. You all need to pay me and subscribe the private blogs."
Let's see, Dow Jones next major test going to be 40000. On Jan 24, 2020.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wJ_BTOLxxo
Hmm. Isn't that too close to the sharpest stock market crash, and the great forecaster did NOT warn anything about major crash?
"Great" call.
again you continue to make the same mistake and cling to a static forecast which is what it looked like at specific point in time, but the market was unable to get passed key bullish reversals and time was simply up. Armstrong can predict turning points, such as the one in 2022(ECM date) with the Dow Jones yearly array lining up with the ECM. You can argue whether 2022 will be a high or a low at this time, we will ultimately need to see new highs above that made this year in 2020 and elect key monthly to yearly bullish reversals to confirm that move with confidence that we will see a temp high in 2022. but mark my words 2022 will be a turning point.
Armstrong and his model can forecast turning points nothing more, nothing less it is your own misunderstanding but time is more important than price. If you like i can post the yearly array for the Dow Jones, the longer term has the most accuracy when it comes to the array.
A forecast has to be static, otherwise it is useless!
If a business is relying on a forecast, they make decisions in the PRESENT based on FUTURE expectations. What good is a weekly, monthly or yearly forecast if it dynamically changes when the forecast date approaches?
The so called failed calls I saw were weekly/monthly reversals which of course are static until the end of each week/month whereby new reversals can be generated and elected based on the price movement for that period.
it is exactly that a yearly forecast will remain static until the end of the year and only then will your position will need to be reevaluated if you are trading purely based on the yearly reversal points.
Yep, therein lies the MAJOR PROBLEM. Look at the 1996 Oil futures arrays in the DOSBOX Emulator screenshot and video. Notice the panic cycles are EMPTY for multiple years, including 2020.
What you are telling everyone is the FORECAST ARRAYS are updated EVERY time cycle! That means the YEARLY forecasts made in 1996 about 2020 will be updated over 24 times!?
WHAT KIND OF YEARLY FORECAST GETS 24 UPDATES!?
Does that mean the daily forecasts for an event precisely 24 years from now will be updated 8760 TIMES BEFORE THE EVENT!?