No, at least obvious cases like this one. No problem. Lets see how
this will be "self resolved" and then we will talk. I won't mention it any more, there is more than enough DT members to resolve this. Either you are right and I am wrong or you are wrong and I am right.
A thought experiment:
Let's say I think that Alice is a scammer. But Alice has a positive trust rating in DT. I'm appalled at the bad judgement of those DT members who left positive ratings for a scammer and I exclude them. Furthermore, I include a few users who labeled Alice with red trust because those users have (in my opinion) good judgement.
Should I be blacklisted from DT1? For what exactly? Aren't we supposed to build our trust lists based on whose judgement/ratings we value (or not)?
Granted someone might disagree that Alice is a scammer and/or that what I'm doing is good for DT or for the forum as a whole. They can exclude me if that's the case. But I don't think they have a case for me to be blacklisted just because they don't like my opinion or my trust list.
If there are morons in DT we deserve to have morons in DT.
I disagree.
Well, it's more of a statement of fact, what with the voting and all. I dislike it too but it's still a fact. I have excluded peloso since forever but if 90+ members of DT1 think that peloso is worthy of a DT position or are indifferent - then that's what we got.