I dont believe a person name Satoshi Nakamoto ever existed. He never had intention to face the world so why would he leave a trace behind. This a myth that will never be known. This was not a 1 mans game
Why i believe he lied about his name
1. He claimed to be a thirty-six-year-old Japanese man. The pic that i seen of him dosent look 36 well in the late 40s
2. Driven in part by anger over the recent financial crisis..Revenge attack on economy BANKING SECTOR!!
3. He invited other software developers to help him improve the code, and corresponded with them, he never revealed any personal details
What make me angry is his amongst us! his around in seminars on many other forums.
My question to Shinichi Mochizuki why 21 million coins?
Stefan Thomas, a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's 500-plus bitcoin forum posts; the resulting chart showed a steep decline to almost no posts between the hours of 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time. Because this pattern held true even on Saturdays and Sundays, it suggested that Nakamoto was asleep at this time, and the hours of 5 a.m. to 11 a.m. GMT are midnight to 6 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (North American Eastern Standard Time). Other clues suggested that Nakamoto was British: A newspaper headline he had encoded in the genesis block came from the UK-published newspaper The Times, and both his forum posts and his comments in the bitcoin source code used British English spellings, such as "optimise" and "colour".[13]
An Internet search by an anonymous blogger of texts similar in writing to the bitcoin whitepaper suggests Nick Szabo's "bit gold" articles as having a similar author.[29] Nick denied being Satoshi, and stated his official opinion on Satoshi and bitcoin in a May 2011 article.[38]
In a March 2014 article in Newsweek, journalist Leah McGrath Goodman doxed Dorian S. Nakamoto of Temple City, California, saying that Satoshi Nakamoto is the man's birth name. Her methods and conclusion drew widespread criticism.[39][40]
In June 2016, the London Review of Books published a piece by Andrew O'Hagan about Nakamoto.[41] The real identity of Satoshi Nakamoto still remains a matter of dispute.