Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7's Collapse on 9/11
by
BluePowder
on 06/05/2020, 22:40:22 UTC
It was a series of pics, perhaps you missed them, when you show inner walls of a building obviously you can not show the outter walls in the same shot, that's just life.. you would assume that after two outter wall pics the third pic might just be the inner wall of the same building. I even gave source, FBI , why would the FBI put the walls of some other building in the 9/11 folder.

that again demonstrates that you were destroyed and had to move to a technicality. you wasted 2 days and 2 pages of bullshit to arrive back at the same thing, which is where are those pics and what are they of.



what explanation would anyone require, I posted a pic of the pentagon, even people in Africa know what that is.  The pic had fire hoses, which usually means during or just after a fire, there is your time as well. Iin a 9/11 thread most people would have figured this out.  I'm really starting to think gr8 was the last year you and franky went to school.




That part may not be an explosion but neither the hole or the front of the pentagon pic is consistent with a plane crash, that's why I showed you the black marker...

A correction. You didn't show me anything. You posted some pict with no link, no explanation, nothing. So now you get exactly what you deserve...

What black marker?
No, you did not post a picture of the Pentagon. You posted a pic of a hole in the wall. Good luck with getting understood by people doing that.

Do you mind a suggestion. Try to be very clear when you make an assertion, and use pictures. I still have no clue "what black marker." Not going to go rummage around and hunt for one, because then... 'uh...is this the right black marker?'