Bitcoin's success is due to the fact that the name does NOT hint at how it may be used
No.. It was successful because it solved the double spend problem. The name was completely irrelevant in comparison... If you don't agree with me on that then it is pointless.
Shitcoins need to worry about branding because that's all they have. Is this a shitcoin? Is it more like doge or bitcoin?
Like how I quoted only the relevant sentence and aborted all the rest? ...oddly ironic
Respecting peoples time and not always re quoting paragraphs and paragraphs of crap is indeed nice editing more people should do it.