I am interested in the question, why was it necessary to release an update that has such big problems that they can't fix them for 2 months? Such shortcomings should be identified and eliminated at the test stage.
If these are minor problems that occur with each update, then the question arises about the competence of the Energi developers, since they can't fix them for so long.
We have already stated that we need to fix the bugs that Andrey has put in the code. Debugging code is not a fast process to begin with, especially when the bugs did not show up during the private or public testing. Also keep in mind that the progress has been further delayed by the tech team's need to shift focus to address other issues as needed, like the DDoS attacks that have occurred.
Which bugs did andrey "put" in the code.
There has been 0 commits fixing any bug
Kindly point us to the commits where the "bug fixing" is happening.
Selicio sorry for the delay in responding;
The bugs we are encountering are the cause of the chain splits.
We did not experience those problems during the private or public testing phases prior to release.
Commits are done when there is something to commit. Most work is done privately, in house, and commits are made when the product is ready.
This is the same way that Gen 3 was done (which people also used to try to claim Gen 3 was a scam due to not seeing much activity on Github prior to release, and now it has been released).