the point was that common output sizes are just that---common on the network.
By "common chip sizes", I mean they're common to CM (ChipMixer). For Non-CM transactions, chip sizes are not common at all.
without a larger verifiable study on that matter, that's arguable.
I'm not aware of CM-specific examples, but it's common for many mixers and exchanges,
BTW, I agree Wasabi creates a more obvious TX, but what I've been trying to prove is CM usage is also clear, even though less obvious at first glance.
i am eagerly awaiting your upcoming research paper where you show how you broke chipmixer. please keep us all apprised.

I wanted to remind users that they should treat CM coins dirty by default (like all mixers, not CM's fault)
that is not a given,
especially given the low volume of bitcoin usage for illicit purposes.