Could be a very useful function if we customize such a tool properly. There's a lot of malicious content posted, that's true and much of it is also misleading readers. The Trust flags are only visible on top of a topic, if someone posts misleading content somewhere forther down the topic, no warning would be visible.
I made a quick visualisation and it's looking interesting:
For scam topics or obviously misleading content a demerit could actually be somewhat useful in my opinion.
If deMerit is introduced I would only grant users with let's say more than 500 earned Merit the right to distribute deMerit. Above 500 earned Merit every 10 earned Meit will result in getting 1 sdeMerit.
For example:
- an user with 554 earned Merit would have [5 sdeMerit
- an user with 702 earned Merit would have 20 sdeMerit
...
There will be no deMerit sources, deMerit is only generated from earned Merit.
If someone's post is getting 1 deMerit, the Merit score of that user would be decreased by 1 point.
We could also argue that lower ranks can use deMerit but only 1 sdeMerit for every 50 earned Merit or similar.
That way people would be warned against malicious content.
I made a quick visualisation and it's looking interesting:
For scam topics or obviously misleading content a demerit could actually be somewhat useful in my opinion.
If deMerit is introduced I would only grant users with let's say more than 500 earned Merit the right to distribute deMerit. Above 500 earned Merit every 10 earned Meit will result in getting 1 sdeMerit.
For example:
- an user with 554 earned Merit would have [5 sdeMerit
- an user with 702 earned Merit would have 20 sdeMerit
...
There will be no deMerit sources, deMerit is only generated from earned Merit.
If someone's post is getting 1 deMerit, the Merit score of that user would be decreased by 1 point.
We could also argue that lower ranks can use deMerit but only 1 sdeMerit for every 50 earned Merit or similar.
Perhaps instead of these requirements, the demerit function could be restricted to moderators of the board, requiring only one press of a button. Just like how the reporting system can be used by anyone but only mods can actually delete posts. Newbies would start complaining about bias or "keeping them down" if legendaries were allowed to do this.
Personally, I would like it much more to have it as a community tool. Bitcointalk is decentralized. Demerit will not solve anything, a newbie with zero merits or -1000 merits will still be able to post crap if it fits his agenda.
deMerit would also be visible directly under the post like Merit is highlighting good posts. That way people would be warned against malicious content.
Lol please stop ... the very fact we are noticing merit is given and earned for posting misleading or incorrect crap does not mean we should then say it is a reliable metric to rely on to demonstrate the critical reasoning powers of those we need to employ to ensure merit is only attributed to objectively valuable posts lol
Let's send the merit cycling fools like pharmacist and tman to merit vampire in the tech boards haha
No. These people must be hand selected to have demonstrated specific skillset and critical reasoning in certain areas. They must be able to present robust and conclusive arguments for any merit removal.
Lol at using earned merits as a marker for removing poorly applied merits. The very idea is quite silly.