I support (some) of them because they are a counterbalancing force to the totally unaccountable iron grip you and your red nosed red assed buddies have over the trust system. I have seen reliable evidence presented against almost none of these people who are regularly and perpetually attacked because they threaten the existing unilateral control of the trust system.
Again -- terrible reasons to include somebody in your trust list, and indicative of your continued misunderstanding of the basic functions of DT.
Actually that is kind of the whole point of the trust system. In spite of that, you feel that you have a right to not only choose who you think uses the system correctly by making your own trust list, but also dictate to me who I and others can include in our trust lists. The mere act of adding some one you don't agree with is "abuse". Also adding people who add people who you say are "abusive" is also "abuse". The only thing not "abuse" according to you is if we copy your inclusions and exclusions exactly.