The user
mhanbostanci[/quote] has left me the following rating:
mhanbostanci 2020-05-11 Reference The real reason for the negative feedback he gave me is that he is a Turkish enemy. In this regard, the flag was opened and the subject was discussed. zz and altcoin_trader are different people I know personally. This is known in the Turkish forum and it is no secret.
You are hostile to people you don't know.
I have tagged the user with the following before this has happened (tmaking the above being a retaliatory rating):
Lauda 2020-05-11 Reference 3 Accounts Connected: Zz u=318348, mhanbostanci u=434984, altcoin_trader u=559459
Multiple alts claiming from the same bounties & also from different bounties during the same time-frame.
My reference is the discovery from Timelord2067:
3 Accounts Connected:Zz,
mhanbostanci,
altcoin_trader,
Proof:- Zz posts the wallet address 19Aw9JN3ypHDrd9AA1LyYJjaTWHHGDhhDP on their profile page and uses it in posts here: [1 ( @yahoo62278 denys them entry (back in 2016 - and is still banning Zz in 2019)], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13],
- mhanbostanci posts the wallet address 1mhandh8J4uJx18sHhgeBJWZLKxMnuqGv on their profile page and uses it in posts here: [A (as quoted by @EFS )], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] [8]to name but a few...
- altcoin_trader posts the wallet add 1JZYPRKap4hTQm9dQQMWhWeivkSo5Y1iUT on their profile page and uses it in posts here: [A], [1 (Zz also posts)], [2], [3],
Wallet [
77c8711960] contains just four wallet addresses:
1mhandh8J4uJx18sHhgeBJWZLKxMnuqGv 0.00022383 259 549263
19Aw9JN3ypHDrd9AA1LyYJjaTWHHGDhhDP 0. 83 467408
1GU2gN5s8ZWNjLto7JoMycMNGwpyPtzARr 0. 33 397713
1JZYPRKap4hTQm9dQQMWhWeivkSo5Y1iUT 0. 17 420332
- snip -
Please click on the post to read the remainder if you are interested. Claims about their alt connection go back to 2015 with this
thread in a trust rating on
altcoin_trader.
Not commenting the linked thread, the wallet connection seems very solid. Opinions?