Re: Reference topic: Why are these members excluded on trust lists?
Not sure which thread to post this to. Originally I thought of the DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) - thread, but given it's on topic for the last few days of discussion, I thought I'd added it here.
This makes no sense at all:
The reference used to counter the negative is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg52890824#msg52890824 which is the following investigation:
Six months and fifteen days later, I read this on the Known Alts thread: (it's the reference given by the negative trust feedback giver) AFAIK it is the first time the accused has responded to the proof I posted in October last.
zz and altcoin_trader are different people I know personally. This is known in the Turkish forum and it is no secret.
You can query this situation from Turkish users you know.
The negative feedback you provided is unfounded and misleading.
I would like to think that clearly my work is sound if a person can contradict themselves by saying triple check my work and a month later counter someone else by referencing my work as proof of the counter.
??
I feel that the negative feedback given to me and the corresponding "counter" are a part of an (un)civil war being waged by factions within a certain local community. Their actions are untrustworthy as they are using my reputation as their field of conflict when attacking each-other.
This makes no sense at all:
Quote
The reference used to counter the negative is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg52890824#msg52890824 which is the following investigation:
3 Accounts Connected:
Zz, mhanbostanci, altcoin_trader,
Proof:
Wallet [77c8711960] contains just four wallet addresses:
Zz, mhanbostanci, altcoin_trader,
Proof:
Wallet [77c8711960] contains just four wallet addresses:
Code:
1mhandh8J4uJx18sHhgeBJWZLKxMnuqGv 0.00022383 259 549263
19Aw9JN3ypHDrd9AA1LyYJjaTWHHGDhhDP 0. 83 467408
1GU2gN5s8ZWNjLto7JoMycMNGwpyPtzARr 0. 33 397713
1JZYPRKap4hTQm9dQQMWhWeivkSo5Y1iUT 0. 17 420332
19Aw9JN3ypHDrd9AA1LyYJjaTWHHGDhhDP 0. 83 467408
1GU2gN5s8ZWNjLto7JoMycMNGwpyPtzARr 0. 33 397713
1JZYPRKap4hTQm9dQQMWhWeivkSo5Y1iUT 0. 17 420332
Six months and fifteen days later, I read this on the Known Alts thread: (it's the reference given by the negative trust feedback giver) AFAIK it is the first time the accused has responded to the proof I posted in October last.
3 Accounts Connected:
...
unfounded claims
...
...
unfounded claims
...
zz and altcoin_trader are different people I know personally. This is known in the Turkish forum and it is no secret.
You can query this situation from Turkish users you know.
The negative feedback you provided is unfounded and misleading.
I would like to think that clearly my work is sound if a person can contradict themselves by saying triple check my work and a month later counter someone else by referencing my work as proof of the counter.
??
I feel that the negative feedback given to me and the corresponding "counter" are a part of an (un)civil war being waged by factions within a certain local community. Their actions are untrustworthy as they are using my reputation as their field of conflict when attacking each-other.