My problem with the theory of evolution is that it is born purely out of the scientific method which conveniently chooses to ignore, and in fact *must* ignore, any philosophical, mathematical, or other kinds of non-empirical facts or truths in the process of theory-making.
Maybe I should have highlighted the hilarious part I was referring to then.
Basically your statement has the facts a full 100.0% wrong. If you were to replace "scientific method" with "religious method" in that sentence, things would be looking much more realistic.
I really liked that you put "philosophy" into that, as it does not belong there in the 1st place.
Never mix up philosophy with science, as it operates under completely different premises/rules and never "results" in "truth" even if you or I may fully agree with it on certain terms. Philosophy and science are two entirely different entities.
Look, if you want to debate a point, that's fine. But can you at least debate against something relevant to my position?