Or people ignored an assertion that was non sensical.
There's nothing wrong with your "Tell me what is wrong..." except that you can't even prove that the collection of disassembled objects previously know as WTT, then falling from one of the World Trade Towers were or were not falling at "free fall speed."
Given the huge clouds of dust, you'd have to rely on radar or acoustic signatures. Then given the settling of the debris, you'd at best have an envelope of uncertainty around your imaginary concept of "free fall speed."
Next you'd have to conjecture that the resistance of the collapse somehow was outside of the bounds of that envelope of uncertainty. Being Tecshare, you'd like to determine that by PROCLAMATION BY TECSHARE.
It doesn't work that way. Show the math and the numbers if you want to be taken seriously.
How about the official 9/11 commission report?
"From 9:59 until 10:28 A.M.
At 9:58:59, the South Tower collapsed in ten seconds..."
P. 305 "
THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT"
How tall was it?
"The North Tower rose 1,368 feet—1,730 feet with a large antenna—and the South Tower stood 1,362 feet high."
https://www.911memorial.org/learn/resources/world-trade-center-history1362 feet in 10 seconds. This requires zero resistance to reach these speeds.
"But its smokey!" You say. What about WTC 7?
"Freefall Acceleration of WTC7"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POUSJm--tgwIt is not complicated. The official story claims the floors impacted each other progressively on the way down. For this to be possible, Netwon's 3rd law of motion would need to be violated as any resistance would decrease the rate of speed of the fall due to the resistance encountered in the way down.
Tell me more about baseless proclamations as you do exactly what you accuse me of.