And thank you for reading it and responding. You are right about the DeepVault, marketing of this feature should be probably more targeted to its potential users. But anyway, it is definitely not a new feature, DeepOnion should introduce something new, at least in a foreseeable future to attract new investors.
True but at the moment, there are only two projects dedicated into blockchain notarization. One is DeepVault and another is Signature Chain. These are my known project. I have a lot of people are looking alternative of traditional notarization. I think DeepVault can be a good one we can reach potential users.
Regarding the reactions to criticism, I know what you mean, but I have a feeling that this started to get better. Well, at least the critical contributions are not deleted here anymore. Seems that someone finally realized that polite and constructive criticism can be beneficial. Next step would be if the team starts to be more involved in this open public discussion here. It's not only about discussions on DeepOnion website with limited audience, we need to attract new people here. And the approach of the team can significantly help to reach this.
The problem is all the polite and harsh criticism are silently ignored by the DEV team and they don't want to have open discussion at all. It seems they are constant on their desire.
Anyway, if DEV team don't come forward, I doubt anything good will happen.
Thank you for your point regarding blockchain notarization. It made me start a little bit of googling. The results brought me some answers, but also some questions. In the results of a simple search for "blockchain notarization", I did not see anything about DeepVault. So I have to ask, why the DeepVault website is not optimized for Google search, especially when this feature is presented to us as important and maybe even unique?
Moreover, within the first 3 pages of results, I found several online services offering blockchain notarization such as codenotary.io, notarised.io, notary.bitcoin.com or stampd.io which even offers various blockchains such as BTC, BCH or DASH. So my second question is, why would someone use DeepVault when there are these services?
And regarding the DEVs ignorance and refusal of open discussion, I have to agree with you, unfortunately. Hope that the DEVs will change their approach soon as it is in their own interest. Current approach is harming the reputation of DeepOnion a lot. Also hope that they are at least reading the posts here and discussing some ideas internally, but maybe I'm just naive.