Fortunately the world is not limited to what you recall. Lets just call documented fact "conspiracy theory" and pretend like it doesn't exist. I guess voter fraud is only important when it doesn't serve your interests.
You have extremely flexible standards of what passes for a "documented fact". The NC 9th district case was a serious one, they had to re-run the election. A republican still won BTW so there is argument to be made that even this case of fraud didn't really change the outcome.
How many such cases can you show let's say in the last 20 years? Proven in the court of law, with the potential to change the outcome of an election.
I don't think we have to set it up to the degree of -- potential to change the outcome of an election -- but I still do agree with the sentiment here. I doubt there are many cases that can be found of voter fraud to begin with, let along with the chance of changing the outcome of the election.
A vote that is illegal is a problem even if it doesn't change the outcome of the election -- effectively it cancels out the vote of someone who is legally allowed to vote. But yes, there should obviously be more attention given to the time where the outcome of the election was (or could've) been altered.
I still think one of the most important things to say to those that think voter fraud is plaguing the nation is -- if it is so easy for Democrats to do it -- why don't Republicans do it right back to balance all of this out? You can't just say that every time you lose its voter fraud and every time you win it's just normal voting.