You are ignoring facts and the most obvious of those is the fact that my pool has found 2429 blocks so far.
No empty blocks in there.
No empty blocks in there.
2492 blocks is NOTHING in the grand scheme of things, the pools in my analysis each of them probably found 100000% more blocks than your pool did ( lazy to do the maths but my estimate was rather conservative i suppose), what i wrote above is a simple statistical point, it is not what I think, the numbers state that the chances for your pool to find an empty or orphan block are slim to nothing, it is like someone who drives once a year around his empty farm and brags about the fact that he got into less car accidents than Michael Schumacher, thinking he has better driving skills when in reality it is merely probability and statics doing their thing.
Quote
You obviously do not understand how work is generated by a pool and how a block can be empty, without the pool purposely producing an empty block like most of the large pools still do.
I understand very well that mathematically empty blocks MUST happen unless the time it takes to download a block, verify transactions, deal with the mempool, build a block =< zero ms, which is not true even if you claim so, even if all pools run on the same LAN with block size being 1byte time will never be =< 0, there will always be empty blocks and there will always be orphan blocks, this is unfortunately how the math works, your words and attempts to deny these facts mean nothing, nobody in their right mind will think that pools purposely mine empty blocks when fees alone are 2btc at times, except for the obvious use of covert asicboost and the other reasons I explained in my topic which you used to advertise your pool
. Quote
So yeah maybe less than half a dozen possible empty blocks in 6 years for all pools on the network - the rest are them doing it on purpose.
Lol there is no "maybe", if you know the time it takes to download a block all the way to reconstructing it, you can tell EXACTLY how many empty blocks could be found without anyone doing it purposely, people have been studying statistics for hundreds s of years not for you to randomly state that "less than half a dozen", i explained in a great detail what is concidered reasonable and what formula to use to figure that out, read the topic again and actually try to learn something.
Quote
before you decide to post incorrect information to promote your argument.
Well all i did was use Siméon Denis Poisson's formulas, if you have a problem with it complain to him (except for the fact that he passed away a few hundred years back or so)
Quote
P.S. I'm probably older than you 
Was reffer to someone else you called stupid, was the first comment of yours i read when i joined the forum, i knew from the start what type of a person you likely were, time has only proved my intial guess.
Quote
Edit: the above is of course actually related to this thread.
On a side note (Again), this topic doesn't belong to the mining board by any means, you are accusing another pool of something, it only fits reputation/service discussion since it is not your pool you are advertising.
Going to put you on ignore for a few months, hopefully you would learn how to communicate with respect and manners by then.
Adiós