@TwitchySeal
Do you see the sorts of low-life riff-raff that are floating about in this forum? Even when you stay calm and try to engage with them in a manner which can only be described as polite and courteous, they always fall back on their usual insult laden ways either by posting directly or by using proxies.
How is what vod will do in the future a documented fact and not an assumption? Do you have a crystal ball or something? Does vod have access to everyones doxx?
I understand he doxxed OG, but that's not proof he will doxx anyone else who criticizes him.
He did it. It is a valid reason for a rating, not trust abuse. You enjoy your semantic gymnastics.
You are claiming he will do it again. Do you think that's a provable fact or an assumption?
Do you have proof he reported OG to government agencies? Or are you assuming that he did that.
He did that, and it's documented and self declared by himself. You really should seek doctor's help for your mental disorders.
How did you even got in a paid signature campaign ?
Do you see the sorts of low-life riff-raff that are floating about in this forum? Even when you stay calm and try to engage with them in a manner which can only be described as polite and courteous, they always fall back on their usual insult laden ways either by posting directly or by using proxies.
Actually the feedback I left Vod is documented fact. No one disputes Vod doxed OGNasty and claimed to have reported him to the IRS. As far as the comment regarding his mental state, I have repeatedly offered to modify the rating and replace it excluding that part if he feels that would make it a valid rating, but he refuses to respond. Vod avoids a direct response at all costs, because he is well aware his actions are indefensible.
How is what vod will do in the future a documented fact and not an assumption? Do you have a crystal ball or something? Does vod have access to everyones doxx?
I understand he doxxed OG, but that's not proof he will doxx anyone else who criticizes him.
He did it. It is a valid reason for a rating, not trust abuse. You enjoy your semantic gymnastics.
You are claiming he will do it again. Do you think that's a provable fact or an assumption?
Do you have proof he reported OG to government agencies? Or are you assuming that he did that.
He did that, and it's documented and self declared by himself. You really should seek doctor's help for your mental disorders.
How did you even got in a paid signature campaign ?