The origin of BOOM is simple, once users transfer BOOM to others, 1% of the total transfer amount is automatically destroyed at the same time. The initial total supply of BOOM is 1 billion. The supply will decrease due to transactions, and no new BOOM will be issued then.
This means that the receiver gets the amount he received with a cut already of 1% of total amount? I don't think that seems to be a good idea that they are burning tokens at the expense of the receiver. If they have made 1 billion supply and has the plan to burn many of it in the long run, why didn't they just made it low supply?
Thank you for kind words.
You can see statistics of BOOM at
coinmarketcap. I personally think that these stats are not that bad, keeping in view the competitive altcoin market.
Every coin has a day and BOOM day is yet to come.
I don't think that's an interesting stats at all.